img_9095

2 Comments on “img_9095

  1. That is a really bad practiceIf you don’t have any IPv6 router, there are no difference No need to do that, for any reason Certainly not for security nor performanceIf you don’t have a IPv6 router, you can’t use anything but IPv4 NAT to reach InternetWhen you set up IPv6, you can easy set your devices in a LAN in IPv6 which is blocked in the routers firewall, so they can’t access internet and internet can’t access themIf you want devices to be accessed from Internet, you put them in a IPv6 LAN which are open to/from Internet And you might want to let some devices access to internet, then you put them in a IPv6 LAN which the devices have access to internet from the firewall in the routerBecause NAT isn’t security, it is a bad hack You still need a firewall in a IPv4 routerAnd IPv6 doesn’t have, because it doesn’t need NAT So you just need to set up the firewall if you want a server accessible from Internet, which is a mess to do from IPv4 And no security advantage at all compared to IPv6Setting a secure network it so much easier with IPv6 then messing with firewalls and NAT in IPv4

  2. Your blog is a testament to your dedication to your craft Your commitment to excellence is evident in every aspect of your writing Thank you for being such a positive influence in the online community

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *